My idea about this:

All team has 1-1 "challange" oppurtinity each half.

If the team has right, on this case the challange oppurtinity can remain.
If the referee has right on this case the team lost the challange for this half.

Why 1 challange each half? My main purpose is I dont want hurt the games continuity. I just want an oppurtinity avoid the mistakes. We are all human, anyone can make a mistake. Challange could mean a lifebelt to both side. Referees' side because they are not only responsible for the decisions, because the team could ask a challange if something was not ok. And teams' side because they could have an oppurtinity correct the refs' mistakes.

#freeteddy
#nicebann

Zitat von sm'

---

My idea about this:

All team has 1-1 "challange" oppurtinity each half.

If the team has right, on this case the challange oppurtinity can remain.
If the referee has right on this case the team lost the challange for this half.

Why 1 challange each half? My main purpose is I dont want hurt the games continuity. I just want an oppurtinity avoid the mistakes. We are all human, anyone can make a mistake. Challange could mean a lifebelt to both side. Referees' side because they are not only responsible for the decisions, because the team could ask a challange if something was not ok. And teams' side because they could have an oppurtinity correct the refs' mistakes.

---

The idea of challenges is good. But I'm not sure how it will be added to the game - let's say for example, the referee gives a throw to the wrong team, in an attacking situation (like Bombas vs AdS). If Ads challenged, how would we know who is right? The only way I can see it working is if the rec was uploaded mid game so we can rectify the mistake. This could end up taking a long time. Or if teams challenged after the game, would we have to remove goals scored, etc? This is a big move and it will lead to a lot of arguments, some captains in this league are not co-operative at all.

It can work if you can use challange only for 2 situations:

1, One of team scored and before the goal was a big mistake. On this case the goal shall be removed.

2, The mistake prevented a goal situation. On this case you can not give a goal, but referee has to provide much more time at the end of the game. Because this is a huge disadvantage for a team. I suggest at least 4 minutes overtime if a team suffers the ref's decision and lose a goalscoring oppurtinity.

By the way this overtime system is nonsense for me. Netto game time is 14-15 min/game, because the throws and goal kicks take much time away. For me the continous game mean 1 min overtime each half, lot of throws mean at least 2 min overtime each half. There is nonsense if ref write 15 sec, 25 sec, 30 sec etc. overtime..:)

I support it, in fact in a new league that we are organizing this will be one of the new features.

Pac could you stop with talking about the new league that you are organizing? I think we got it now. Starts to be annoying a little bit.

sero bitte

I support it too. Challenges working fine in polish league, if WAH wanna some examples how it work there, they can easily contact with our administration. This is a simple solution and works not only after unfair goals, but on every little referee decision. Of course challenges are limited, if i remember correctly:
Each team have 3 challenges for a season, but if team ask for challenge and ref (after anylize of rec) decide "You have right, challenge is correct", they will have still 3 challenges to use after the game. If challenge will be wrong, only 2 challenges will left for this team.

thats actually a nice idea Haka

Zitat von Hakaes

---

I support it too. Challenges working fine in polish league, if WAH wanna some examples how it work there, they can easily contact with our administration. This is a simple solution and works not only after unfair goals, but on every little referee decision. Of course challenges are limited, if i remember correctly:
Each team have 3 challenges for a season, but if team ask for challenge and ref (after anylize of rec) decide "You have right, challenge is correct", they will have still 3 challenges to use after the game. If challenge will be wrong, only 2 challenges will left for this team.

---

Exactly, and yet 3 challenges per game, but if challenge is wrong, then no more challenges this match.

As Hakaes said, it is working really good in polish league, but you will need to clearly define in the rules, how it is working, in my opinion, better, if ref are checking rec during the match, than administration after match.

Hababam FC is ready for wah , offical website : http://haxball.site123.me/